Wie messen Sie den Fortschritt Ihrer L&D-Programme? Wie steigern Sie das Engagement für Schulungen? Was braucht es, um eine gesunde Kultur in Ihrer Organisation zu schaffen? Wie schlägt sich Lepaya?
Beliebte Kategorien:

Ausgewählte Artikel

Jeroen Kraaijenbrink: How organizations can overcome the honesty gap
Senior leadership and boardroom teams invest heavily in commercial strategies to win market shares. Yet the most important and honest information driving strategy circulates in teams underneath, never making it to the table where decisions are made.Jeroen Kraaijenbrink, Executive Coach and Strategy Consultant at Kraaijenbrink Advisory, has spent years working on what he calls the honesty gap. We sat down with him to understand what the honesty gap actually is, where it lives in organizations, and why fixing it requires a leadership shift.How do you define the honesty gap?There's a narrow definition and a broad one. The broad one is: we have created organizations and systems where it's barely possible to be honest to yourself, about yourself, and honest to other people.Honesty isn't just lying. It's integrity, being authentically connected to other people and being aware of your own emotions and your own biases.The honesty gap, in a narrow sense, is the fact that truth and information don’t travel vertically upwards in a company. It's often hard to speak openly to your manager because it’s become rational not to. Many people have the experience: 'I've tried it once but then I was punished for it, or was ignored, so let it be, never mind.' That's the fascinating part: it's not good for people, it's not good for organizations and yet we somehow keep this system intact.Is it less about individual dishonesty and more about a collective culture?A lot of the most important information going through your company is between people and in conversations. You need to find a way to have an honest conversation, where the things that matter get on the meeting table, not just in the informal circuit. And I think that's pretty rare.A more systematic definition is that we're not using the collective intelligence of a company enough. We can radically improve it because we’ve made it rational to hide the truth and to keep things to yourself. A lot of it may not be intentional, but the very fact that someone is in a position above you automatically creates this tension: 'What do I show? What don't I show? Because my next performance appraisal is coming up.'Where does the honesty gap typically show up first, and who owns the problem?It starts with leaders. Solving it needs one leader at the top, the CEO at least, being open and reflective enough to admit that there is an honesty gap and that they are part of it. That's the self-reflection you need for any improvement and any change. Like in coaching: you need to be aware that there is stuff to improve. You don't need to be a perfect leader, but you need to be open enough to admit that there is an issue.You talk about the 'persona trap', what is that?You're stuck in a persona where you perform in a certain way within your company. You have a role, a position, a reputation, and that locks you into specific behaviors. The worse the match between who you are as a person and how you need to show up in your organization, the more inner conflict that’s created. Especially at the top, it’s a problem for many executives. They're supposed to be the people who know it all and be decisive. While if you're honest, you don't necessarily know everything, you’re uncertain and have anxieties.The inner core of the honesty gap is breaking the performance, breaking the acting you feel you must do. If you've put yourself in a role of being the strong, decisive, number-oriented leader, that's how you have to behave. But most people don't feel very comfortable in that kind of role because it's not who they are.Can you fix the honesty gap through individual coaching alone or does the system have to change?Part of it is a personal change, part of it is a system change. You can be on your own and be very authentic, but if the system doesn't change at all, you’ll struggle to break the honesty gap.What you need to do is work on the people, the culture, and the system. Ideally that has to include the top, because otherwise it stays at the level of the person being coached. If it's a team lead or a mid-manager, that person can partly create an island in the organization, a safe space for their team and their department. But still, the appraisal systems, objectives, and culture are company-wide. Why is this so hard to shift, even when leaders recognize the problem?We have normalized this idea that you have to be strategic in what you tell and what you show. You have to show up in a certain role at work. It's also the result of how we have separated work from life, which is a very unnatural thing. It's from the industrial age, because for any other species, work is life. But now there’s a split between work, with all the routines in companies, and then your private life. There's just one you, you're the same person at home as you are at work. The good news is that the honesty gap can be closed. While many companies have unintentionally created environments where people hesitate to speak openly, organizations prioritizing trust, authenticity, and psychological safety can unlock a competitive advantage. When employees feel safe to share concerns, ideas, and perspectives, collective intelligence grows, decision-making improves, and stronger relationships emerge across every level of the business.

Preparing people for an AI future nobody can fully predict
A conversation with Pascal Struijk on why Learning & Development sits at the center of successful AI adoption.
.webp)
Why finance talent needs new skills for AI cyber threats
Anthropic's Mythos exposed a critical gap in European banking's cyber defences. The vulnerability isn't just technical , but also human. Raymond Lansheuvel on the skills finance teams need to close it.
Alle Artikel

Intake processes, systems thinking, and courage: What it takes to rewire L&D
Discover what it takes to shift L&D from training delivery to performance consulting, with practical strategies on intake processes, systems thinking, and AI adoption.
.png)
How EY, PwC, and McKinsey Are Rebuilding Their Workforce for AI and What HR Can Learn
See how EY, PwC, and McKinsey are rebuilding their workforce for AI, and what HR and L&D can learn about skills, workflows, and adoption.
.webp)
3 Fähigkeiten, um 2026 ein strategischer L&D-Partner zu werden
Entdecken Sie die drei grundlegenden Fähigkeiten, die L&D-Führungskräfte benötigen, um Stakeholder zu beeinflussen, Lernen mit der Geschäftsstrategie in Einklang zu bringen und die Unternehmensleistung im Zeitalter der KI zu steigern.

Wie die Personalabteilung die Lücke in den Führungskompetenzen im KI-Zeitalter schließen kann
Pascal Struijk, Produktleiter bei Lepaya, hebt hervor, wie die Personalabteilung Führungskräfte fördern kann, die die teamweite Einführung von KI fördern und die Ambitionen der KI in wertvolle Geschäftsergebnisse umsetzen können.
.webp)
Eigenverantwortung: Warum autonome Rechenschaftspflicht eine Top-Fähigkeit für 2026 geworden ist
Mit dem Wegfall von Managementebenen und der Standardisierung von Remote-Arbeit ist die Eigenverantwortung um 40 % gestiegen und gehört nun zu den Top-5 der geschulten Fähigkeiten.
.webp)
Der Wendepunkt: Einblicke von 8 Experten darüber, was L&D und HR im Jahr 2026 werden müssen
In der KI-Ära stehen Personalabteilung und L&D vor einer unbequemen Frage: Was ist unser Wert, wenn KI das tun kann, was wir traditionell getan haben? Acht Experten erörtern, ob KI die zukünftige Belegschaft prägen wird oder ob sie schrittweise abgeschafft wird.
Durchsuchen Sie unsere Inhalte nach Kategorien
Bleib dranfor our monthly updates
Abonnieren Sie, um Inspiration für L&D, innovative Strategien und praktische Ratschläge zu erhalten.




