What slowmaxxing and microshifting tell HR about employee burnout

Work is changing, and so are employees’ expectations of how the working day should look and feel.

Traditional ways of working often place emphasis on fixed schedules, constant availability and maintaining productivity throughout the day. However, employees are increasingly looking for ways to make work fit better with their energy levels, personal responsibilities and need for recovery.

This shift raises important questions for HR teams: how can organisations support flexibility without compromising collaboration, performance or employee wellbeing?

Two emerging workplace trends offer an interesting perspective on these changing expectations: microshifting and slowmaxxing. Both reflect how employees are adapting to workplace demands, but they focus on different things. Microshifting changes when people work, while slowmaxxing changes the pace at which they work.

Neither trend automatically signals burnout. However, both can reveal underlying challenges related to workload, flexibility and expectations around availability.

‍

What are microshifting and slowmaxxing?

Microshifting: taking control of working hours

Microshifting means splitting the working day into shorter blocks instead of following a fixed nine to five schedule.

Employees might start early, take a break for childcare or an appointment, and return later to finish their work. Others organise demanding tasks around their energy levels and periods of concentration.

Microshifting can help employees balance personal responsibilities and work more effectively. However, without clear boundaries, flexibility can turn into an extended working day.

Slowmaxxing: taking control of the pace

Slowmaxxing means deliberately working at a more sustainable pace. Employees may focus on their assigned responsibilities, respond to non-urgent messages later and protect time for breaks.

This challenges the assumption that constant availability equals productivity.

For some employees, slowmaxxing is a way to protect their wellbeing. For others, it may reflect frustration with excessive workloads or a belief that extra effort will not lead to recognition or career progression.

‍

What does the data tell us?

Recent data show the pressure behind both trends:

• 40% of employees worldwide experienced significant daily stress. Gallup found that managers reported higher stress levels than individual contributors: 45% versus 39%.
• Only 12% of employees in Europe are engaged at work, compared with a global average of 20%, according to Gallup.
• 61% of workers are interested in microshifting, according to Owl Labs' State of Hybrid Work 2026 report. Interest reaches 70% among managers and 42% among individual contributors.

Together, the figures explain why both trends are spreading. When stress stays high and employees have little say over workload, priorities or availability expectations, they adjust what they can control: their own time and pace. Adjusting is also quieter than asking for a lighter load, so managers can miss it.

‍

What HR and L&D can do

HR and L&D teams can respond to these trends in five practical ways.

1. Help managers recognise stress

Managers need to recognise changes in working habits and start supportive conversations. L&D can provide practical training in workload check-ins, prioritisation and identifying early signs of stress. Managers also need realistic workloads and sufficient support themselves.

2. Set clear expectations for flexibility

Agree on availability, response times and collaboration hours. Adapt these expectations to different roles so employees can benefit from flexibility without feeling pressure to remain available all day.

3. Reward outcomes, not hours

If employees believe that staying online late improves their promotion prospects, they may prioritise visibility over results. HR should review performance and recognition practices to ensure employees are assessed on meaningful outcomes, work quality and collaboration.

4. Make sustainable performance part of everyday work

Encourage focused work, reasonable breaks and healthy communication boundaries. L&D can build skills in time management, communication and prioritisation, while HR ensures that organisational practices support these behaviours.

‍

From individual habits to organisational change

Microshifting and slowmaxxing show that employees are becoming more deliberate about when and how they work. Whether that is a good sign depends on what sits behind it. With enough autonomy and clear expectations, both can support wellbeing and help people do good work. Without them, they can mean employees are managing too much pressure on their own.

Employees should not have to redesign their schedules or slow down on purpose just to make their jobs manageable. When they do, it usually points to something in how work is organised, such as workload, priorities or what gets recognised.

For HR and L&D, the more useful question is what these changes reveal about how work is designed, managed and rewarded. That answer says more than the behaviour itself.