Empower your individual contributors to enhance their skills and impact in your organization.
Discover more
Measuring Learning Satisfaction. The Three Most Important Questions
Date created
February 26, 2021
Last updated:
May 6, 2025
|
5 min read
.webp)
Table of Content
If you invest in a learning program, you naturally also want to know whether the investment has added any value. You can do this following 5 key steps, as we showed in our previous blog. The first step is to measure learning satisfaction. You can always measure that with endless questionnaires, or, instead, you can also limit yourself to the core. We figured out what the three most important questions are.
ROI: Pyramid of Learning satisfaction and Performance
In our previous blog, we introduced the ROI Pyramid of Learning and Performance, a pyramid used to forecast and evaluate investments in Human Resources and L&D. With the help of this pyramid you first analyze whether the problem to be solved is worth the investment. Furthermore, if that is the case and you decide to implement a learning program, the measurement and evaluation will follow.
Learning satisfaction
The first thing that needs to be measured is learning satisfaction: how satisfied are the employees with the learning program? Evaluations at this level aim to determine whether a training program has created the right conditions for optimal learning to take place. Do the participants feel that they have learned something and to what extent can the information learned be useful in their work? What are the three most important questions in such a core survey? The three mentioned questions are the following.
1. What did you think of the training or program?
First of all, you naturally want to know how the employee experienced each training. The best way to do this is to ask for a grade on a ten-point scale. However, there is a small pointer to consider. Research shows that this method works as a reflection of the relationship between the trainer and the other participants, therefore, in order to gain more feedback, it is important to not only ask for a mark on a ten-point scale, but to also ask for an additional explanation of why the grade was given.
2. What did you think of the trainer or instructor?
A very similar concept applies here. This question asks for an assessment of the trainer on a ten-point scale, while also asking for an explanation. What feedback would the employee like to give to the trainer?. This can be constructive criticism, but of course also a compliment. If you’d like, you can also ask additional questions that dig deeper into the instructor’s performance. Consider the following options: What was the knowledge level of the trainer? How well prepared was the trainer? How enthusiastic was the trainer?
3. What did you think of the training method?
A good training must be a mix of instructor-led presentation sessions, as well as activities where students work on specific tasks – individually, or in groups. A training that is solely composed of heavy presentations may lack practice, therefore, offering a less effective result.
The next steps in the pyramid
The next steps in the pyramid are about the learning outcome – what have the employees learned – and about the learning application – will they actually apply what they have learned. It is up to the managers to assess whether the behavior of the employees has actually changed – the learning outcome – and finally we come to the question of the learning efficiency: was the learning program worth the investment.
Do you want to know more about Learning Satisfaction?
In the blog series about an impactful learning program, we use the ROI Pyramid of Learning and Performance as our construction sketch. In subsequent blogs, we will zoom into the other steps of the pyramid. Do you have questions after reading this blog, or would you like to spar with someone who is also working on this? Let us know! Even if you want to talk further, you can reach us at info@lepaya.com.
Ready to upskill your people & transform your business?
We offer a scalable employee training solution. It lets you continuously upskill your people.
Book a callDiscover Lepaya's Professional Academy
.webp)
No items found.
Ready to upskill your people and transform your business?
Book a meeting.webp)
Related articles
Review by:
Jeroen Kraaijenbrink: How organizations can overcome the honesty gap
Senior leadership and boardroom teams invest heavily in commercial strategies to win market shares. Yet the most important and honest information driving strategy circulates in teams underneath, never making it to the table where decisions are made.Jeroen Kraaijenbrink, Executive Coach and Strategy Consultant at Kraaijenbrink Advisory, has spent years working on what he calls the honesty gap. We sat down with him to understand what the honesty gap actually is, where it lives in organizations, and why fixing it requires a leadership shift.How do you define the honesty gap?There's a narrow definition and a broad one. The broad one is: we have created organizations and systems where it's barely possible to be honest to yourself, about yourself, and honest to other people.Honesty isn't just lying. It's integrity, being authentically connected to other people and being aware of your own emotions and your own biases.The honesty gap, in a narrow sense, is the fact that truth and information don’t travel vertically upwards in a company. It's often hard to speak openly to your manager because it’s become rational not to. Many people have the experience: 'I've tried it once but then I was punished for it, or was ignored, so let it be, never mind.' That's the fascinating part: it's not good for people, it's not good for organizations and yet we somehow keep this system intact.Is it less about individual dishonesty and more about a collective culture?A lot of the most important information going through your company is between people and in conversations. You need to find a way to have an honest conversation, where the things that matter get on the meeting table, not just in the informal circuit. And I think that's pretty rare.A more systematic definition is that we're not using the collective intelligence of a company enough. We can radically improve it because we’ve made it rational to hide the truth and to keep things to yourself. A lot of it may not be intentional, but the very fact that someone is in a position above you automatically creates this tension: 'What do I show? What don't I show? Because my next performance appraisal is coming up.'Where does the honesty gap typically show up first, and who owns the problem?It starts with leaders. Solving it needs one leader at the top, the CEO at least, being open and reflective enough to admit that there is an honesty gap and that they are part of it. That's the self-reflection you need for any improvement and any change. Like in coaching: you need to be aware that there is stuff to improve. You don't need to be a perfect leader, but you need to be open enough to admit that there is an issue.You talk about the 'persona trap', what is that?You're stuck in a persona where you perform in a certain way within your company. You have a role, a position, a reputation, and that locks you into specific behaviors. The worse the match between who you are as a person and how you need to show up in your organization, the more inner conflict that’s created. Especially at the top, it’s a problem for many executives. They're supposed to be the people who know it all and be decisive. While if you're honest, you don't necessarily know everything, you’re uncertain and have anxieties.The inner core of the honesty gap is breaking the performance, breaking the acting you feel you must do. If you've put yourself in a role of being the strong, decisive, number-oriented leader, that's how you have to behave. But most people don't feel very comfortable in that kind of role because it's not who they are.Can you fix the honesty gap through individual coaching alone or does the system have to change?Part of it is a personal change, part of it is a system change. You can be on your own and be very authentic, but if the system doesn't change at all, you’ll struggle to break the honesty gap.What you need to do is work on the people, the culture, and the system. Ideally that has to include the top, because otherwise it stays at the level of the person being coached. If it's a team lead or a mid-manager, that person can partly create an island in the organization, a safe space for their team and their department. But still, the appraisal systems, objectives, and culture are company-wide. Why is this so hard to shift, even when leaders recognize the problem?We have normalized this idea that you have to be strategic in what you tell and what you show. You have to show up in a certain role at work. It's also the result of how we have separated work from life, which is a very unnatural thing. It's from the industrial age, because for any other species, work is life. But now there’s a split between work, with all the routines in companies, and then your private life. There's just one you, you're the same person at home as you are at work. The good news is that the honesty gap can be closed. While many companies have unintentionally created environments where people hesitate to speak openly, organizations prioritizing trust, authenticity, and psychological safety can unlock a competitive advantage. When employees feel safe to share concerns, ideas, and perspectives, collective intelligence grows, decision-making improves, and stronger relationships emerge across every level of the business.
.webp)
.webp)
Ready to drive impact together?
Close skill gaps, accelerate growth, and future-proof your workforce.
